[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-113-1-civil-law-017":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-113-1-民法概要-017","house-113-1-civil-law-017",113,1,17,"甲向乙銀行貸款新臺幣 500 萬元，並以甲所有之 A 地為乙設定普通抵押權，雙方約定債權已屆清償期而未為清償時，A 地之所有權移屬於乙。就該流押契約之效力，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"絕對無效","相對無效","非經登記，不生效力","非經登記，不得對抗第三人","D",null,"本題考點：流押（流抵）約定的效力，也就是「屆期未清償即由抵押權人取得抵押物所有權」這種約定的法律評價。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 873-1 條第一項，約定於債權已屆清償期而未為清償時，抵押物之所有權移屬於抵押權人者，非經登記，不得對抗第三人。甲與乙的約定正是該條所稱的流押約定，法律並未使其無效，而是採登記對抗主義：未經登記者在甲乙之間仍然有效，只是不能拿來對抗第三人，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 《民法》第 873-1 條第一項並未規定此種約定無效，反而承認其效力，只用登記決定對抗力的有無。\n(B) 條文的法律效果是對抗力受限，而非效力相對；《民法》第 873-1 條第二項還替這種約定設了清算義務，可見約定本身有效。\n(C) 條文寫的是「不得對抗第三人」，不是「不生效力」，兩者的分界正是登記對抗主義與登記生效主義的差異。\n(D) 與《民法》第 873-1 條第一項的文字相符，未經登記者僅生不得對抗第三人的結果，正確。\n【記憶點】流押約定不是無效，是「沒登記就只能對內」；而且抵押權人真的取得房地時要清算找補。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-016","甲以自有土地設定抵押權予乙，以擔保其債權，該債權之請求權於 113 年 3 月 1 日因時效而消滅。下列敘述，何者正確？",16,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-018","甲向乙銀行借貸新臺幣 1000 萬元，並以甲所有之 A 屋為乙設定普通抵押權。嗣後，因第三人丙之過失，致 A 屋滅失，下列敘述，何者正確？",18,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-015","甲以行使普通地上權之意思，二十年間和平、公然、繼續在乙已登記之 A 地上有 B 屋，下列敘述，何者正確？",15,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-019","著有數本暢銷理財專書之甲，某日遭汽車駕駛人丙撞傷，卻於與丙損害賠償協議達成前，突發心肌梗塞猝死，留有土地一筆及尚未繳清貸款之房屋一棟，某上市電子公司股份 100 萬股，銀行存款 30 萬元，尚欠有乙銀行之信用貸款 20 萬元。下列何者非屬繼承之標的？",19,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-014","甲乙丙丁分別共有 A 地，甲以乙丙丁為被告提起分割共有物之訴，獲得勝訴確定判決。下列敘述，何者正確？",14,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-020","民法就夫妻財產制採類型法定原則，下列何者並非我國現行民法規定之夫妻財產制類型？",20,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-017",114,"依我國民法關於地上權之規定，下列何者正確之論述？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-017",112,"土地所有人非因故意或重大過失逾越地界建築房屋，而鄰地所有人知其越界，卻不即時提出異議者，下列何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-017",111,"關於夫妻法定財產制之規定，下列敘述何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-017",110,"地上權未定有期限者，存續期間逾多少年或地上權成立之目的已不存在時，法院得因當事人之請求，斟酌地上權成立之目的、建築物或工作物之種類、性質及利用狀況等情形，定其存續期間或終止其地上權。下列何者正確？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-109-1-civil-law-017",109,"甲、乙、丙、丁四人共有一筆 A 土地，應有部分各登記為四分之一，甲未經乙、丙、丁之同意，擅自占有 A 土地四分之三面積的土地，在其上興建一 B 屋。下列敘述，何者正確？",1786689126397]