[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-113-1-brokerage-law-021":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-113-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-021","house-113-1-brokerage-law-021",113,1,21,"下列何者不是定型化契約條款推定顯失公平之情形？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"違反平等互惠原則者","條款與其所排除不予適用之任意規定之立法意旨顯相矛盾者","契約之主要權利或義務，因受條款之限制，致契約之目的難以達成者","定型化契約中之定型化契約條款牴觸個別磋商條款之約定者","D",null,"本題考點：《消費者保護法》第 12 條第二項推定顯失公平的三種情形，與其他條款失效事由的區別。\n【正解理由】依《消費者保護法》第 12 條第一項，定型化契約中之條款違反誠信原則，對消費者顯失公平者，無效；同條第二項則列舉三款推定其顯失公平的情形，即違反平等互惠原則者、條款與其所排除不予適用之任意規定之立法意旨顯相矛盾者、契約之主要權利或義務因受條款之限制致契約之目的難以達成者。選項所述定型化契約條款牴觸個別磋商條款，規定在同法第 15 條，效果是牴觸部分直接無效，不必經由推定，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 屬之。違反平等互惠原則者，為《消費者保護法》第 12 條第二項第一款所列。\n(B) 屬之。條款與其所排除不予適用之任意規定之立法意旨顯相矛盾者，為同條項第二款所列。\n(C) 屬之。契約之主要權利或義務因受條款之限制致契約之目的難以達成者，為同條項第三款所列。\n(D) 不屬之。此為《消費者保護法》第 15 條的規定，定型化契約中之定型化契約條款牴觸個別磋商條款之約定者，其牴觸部分無效，屬直接無效而非推定顯失公平。\n【記憶點】三款推定要先過顯失公平這一關，個別磋商條款優先則是一牴觸就無效。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-020","預售屋買賣定型化契約應記載及不得記載事項規定，接通自來水、電力之管線費及其相關費用（例如安裝配置設計費、施工費、道路開挖費、復原費及施工人員薪資等）應由誰負擔？",20,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-022","1 樓露台屬於全體住戶共有，為了有效利用露台空間，住戶間常會將露台給該特定住戶使用，此露台稱為？",22,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-019","不動產經紀業者告知消費者「今天不簽約就沒機會」、「不簽約就不能看契約」、並在契約中記載「已確實攜回本契約書審閱 5 日以上無誤或是已詳閱並充分瞭解本契約書及附件內容，無須 5 日以上審閱期，本約簽訂後，確認即生契約效力無誤」，請問此定型化契約條款效力為何？",19,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-023","大樓規約約定 1 樓露台屬於 1 樓甲使用，嗣後 3 樓所有權人乙將其房地產權出售並過戶給丙，請問該規約對丙繼受人有無效力？",23,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-018","不動產經紀業違反不動產經紀業管理條例相關規定時，下列何種情形，直轄市、縣（市）主管機關應先令其限期改正，屆期未改正，始處一定金額之罰鍰？",18,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-024","3 樓住戶因浴室漏水，經抓漏後發現是 3、4 樓樓地板內之管線自然損壞導致漏水，請問修繕費用由誰負擔？",24,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-021",114,"依公平交易法之規定，法院因事業違反該法之規定，致侵害他人權益者，被害人之請求，如為事業之故意行為，得依侵害情節，酌定損害額以上之賠償。但不得超過已證明損害額之幾倍？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-021",112,"依消費者保護法規定，有關定型化契約應記載或不得記載事項之規定，下列何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-021",111,"下列有關定型化契約條款敘述中那幾項是正確的？①企業經營者在定型化契約中所用之定型化契約條款如有疑義時，條款內容應本公平之解釋，不應偏向企業經營者或消費者 ②企業經營者在與消費者訂立定型化契約前，須至少提供三十日以內之合理審閱期間，供消費者審閱全部條款內容 ③企業經營者以定型化契約條款訂定之使消費者拋棄合理審閱期間之條款為有效條款 ④定型化契約中之主要權利或義務條款，因受條款之限制，致契約之目的難以達成者顯失公平，故為無效。",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-021",110,"下列有關公平交易法對於事業聯合行為規定之敘述，何者錯誤？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-021",109,"甲為 A 屋的所有權人，委託乙仲介公司幫忙賣房子。關於甲乙適用消費者保護法的情形，下列敘述何者錯誤？",1786689134389]