[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":70},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-112-1-civil-law-024":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-112-1-民法概要-024","house-112-1-civil-law-024",112,1,24,"關於回復喪失繼承權之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"子女為了遺產而謀殺父親，即喪失對父親之繼承權，因被繼承人原諒繼承人之行為而回復繼承權","偽造、變造、隱匿、湮滅被繼承人關於繼承之遺囑者，喪失繼承權，得因被繼承人原諒繼承人之行為而回復其繼承權","對於被繼承人有重大之虐待或侮辱情事，經被繼承人表示其不得繼承時，喪失繼承權，但之後仍可因獲得被繼承人之原諒而回復繼承權","以詐欺或脅迫妨害被繼承人為關於繼承之遺囑，或妨害其撤回或變更者，喪失繼承權，得因被繼承人原諒繼承人之行為而回復其繼承權","A",null,"本題考點：繼承權喪失之事由，以及何種失權得因被繼承人宥恕而回復。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 1145 條第二項，同條第一項「第二款至第四款」之失權，經被繼承人宥恕者，其繼承權不喪失；第一項第一款「故意致被繼承人或應繼承人於死或雖未致死因而受刑之宣告者」不在其列，一經該當即確定喪失繼承權，縱被繼承人事後原諒，亦不回復。為遺產而謀殺父親正是第一款之情形，(A) 謂可因原諒而回復繼承權，錯誤，故選 A。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 《民法》第 1145 條第二項之宥恕規定僅及於第一項第二款至第四款，不含第一款之殺害行為，失權後不因原諒而回復，本選項敘述錯誤，為本題答案。\n(B) 偽造、變造、隱匿、湮滅被繼承人關於繼承之遺囑，為《民法》第 1145 條第一項第四款事由，依同條第二項經宥恕者繼承權不喪失，敘述正確。\n(C) 重大虐待或侮辱經被繼承人表示不得繼承，為《民法》第 1145 條第一項第五款事由；此款失權以被繼承人之表示為要件，被繼承人事後宥恕即係不再維持該表示，繼承權得以回復，敘述正確。\n(D) 以詐欺或脅迫妨害被繼承人為關於繼承之遺囑或妨害其撤回、變更，為《民法》第 1145 條第一項第三款事由，經宥恕者不喪失繼承權，敘述正確。\n【記憶點】第一款殺害屬絕對失權不可回復；二至四款經宥恕不喪失；第五款繫於被繼承人之表示。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-023","關於遺產繼承之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",23,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-025","關於拋棄繼承之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",25,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-022","關於民法第 1031 條之 1 夫妻財產制中之特有財產之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",22,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":13,"year":41,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-001","甲就其所有之 A 地，先與乙訂立買賣契約，後與丙訂立買賣契約，均未辦理所有權移轉登記。關於二個買賣契約之效力，下列敘述，何者正確？",113,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-021","就法定夫妻財產制之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",21,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":41,"session":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-002","有關行為能力之敘述，下列何者正確？",2,[51,55,58,62,66],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-024",114,"關於生前特種贈與的歸扣，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":41,"stem":57,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-024","民法關於特留分比例之規定，下列敘述，何者錯誤？",{"webId":59,"year":60,"stem":61,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-024",111,"關於財團法人之敘述，下列何者正確？",{"webId":63,"year":64,"stem":65,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-024",110,"關於喪失繼承權情事的敘述，下列何者正確？",{"webId":67,"year":68,"stem":69,"number":14},"house-109-1-civil-law-024",109,"甲、乙為夫妻，並無子女。丙、丁為甲之父母。甲死亡時留有 350 萬元之現金及對丙有 50 萬元之債權。試問，於遺產分割時，丙可以分得多少遺產？",1786689126717]