[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":70},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-112-1-civil-law-003":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-112-1-民法概要-003","house-112-1-civil-law-003",112,1,3,"有關限制行為能力之敘述，下列何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"滿 16 歲之未成年人寫遺囑時，仍須經法定代理人同意，否則效力未定","16 歲之甲偽造身分證，使相對人乙誤信甲已滿 18 歲，而與甲簽訂買賣契約，該買賣契約有效","限制行為能力人為代理人時，代理人受領代理權仍須經法定代理人之同意","法定代理人可以概括允許限制行為能力人為法律行為","B",null,"本題考點：限制行為能力人所為法律行為的效力，特別是使用詐術的例外。\n【正解理由】《民法》第 83 條規定「限制行為能力人用詐術使人信其為有行為能力人或已得法定代理人之允許者，其法律行為為有效」。16 歲之甲偽造身分證，使乙誤信其已滿 18 歲而締約，正是以詐術使相對人信其為有行為能力人，該買賣契約直接有效，不再停留在效力未定狀態，故選 B。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 《民法》第 1186 條第二項規定「限制行為能力人，無須經法定代理人之允許，得為遺囑。但未滿十六歲者，不得為遺囑」，滿 16 歲之未成年人立遺囑不必經同意，本項錯誤。\n(B) 完全符合《民法》第 83 條的詐術要件，以詐術破壞交易信賴者不再受行為能力制度的保護，契約有效，本項正確。\n(C) 《民法》第 104 條規定「代理人所為或所受意思表示之效力，不因其為限制行為能力人而受影響」，限制行為能力人受領代理權的授與不必得法定代理人同意，本項錯誤。\n(D) 依《民法》第 77 條，允許是就個別的意思表示而為；同法第 84 條的允許以特定財產之處分為範圍，第 85 條的允許以獨立營業為範圍，都有明確界限，概括允許一切法律行為與這三條的規範方式不合，本項錯誤。\n【記憶點】限制行為能力人用詐術謊稱自己已成年，就不再受保護傘遮蔽，《民法》第 83 條讓該法律行為直接有效。",true,[26,30,34,37,41,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-002","有關權利客體之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",2,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-004","下列情形，那一行為需向法院聲請撤銷，才會發生撤銷之效力？",4,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":13,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-001","有關權利能力之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":38,"stem":39,"number":40,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-005","甲向乙推銷一只古董錶，甲出價新臺幣（下同）10 萬元問乙要不要買，乙答覆說：「如果 8 萬元我就買」，請問乙的答覆性質上為何？",5,{"webId":42,"stem":43,"number":44,"year":45,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-025","下列何者屬於當然無效之法律行為？",25,111,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-006","甲向乙購買乙對於丙的債權，但丙已於買賣前清償系爭債權而使該債權消滅，請問該買賣契約之效力如何？",6,[51,55,59,62,66],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-003",114,"下列敘述，何者與民法法人之規定並不相容？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-003",113,"甲將其所有之名畫出租於乙，並未將代理權授與乙。詎料，乙竟以甲之代理人名義，與善意之丙訂立買賣契約，將名畫出賣並交付於丙。甲不承認乙之無權代理行為，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":45,"stem":61,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-003","下列何者得為被繼承人親屬中之法定繼承人？",{"webId":63,"year":64,"stem":65,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-003",110,"關於失蹤人的敘述，下列何者正確？",{"webId":67,"year":68,"stem":69,"number":14},"house-109-1-civil-law-003",109,"甲與乙訂立買賣契約，將其二手汽車出賣予乙，若當事人間無特別約定者，關於該汽車之利益及危險，下列何者正確？",1786689126507]