[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":70},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-112-1-civil-law-001":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":24,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":23},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":13,"stem":14,"options":15,"answer":20,"answerNote":21,"lawYear":12,"explanation":22,"freq":13,"indexable":23},"house-112-1-民法概要-001","house-112-1-civil-law-001",112,1,"有關權利能力之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"A":16,"B":17,"C":18,"D":19},"人的權利能力始於出生終於死亡，因此胎兒尚未出生所以沒有權利能力","人的權利能力不得拋棄，更不得轉讓","法人除於法令或性質上之限制外，仍享有權利能力","植物人仍享有權利能力","A",null,"本題考點：自然人與法人權利能力的起訖，以及胎兒受保護的特別規定。\n【正解理由】《民法》第 6 條規定「人之權利能力，始於出生，終於死亡」，但同法第 7 條接著規定「胎兒以將來非死產者為限，關於其個人利益之保護，視為既已出生」，可見胎兒在有利於自己的範圍內被視為已經出生，並非完全沒有權利能力，(A) 只援用原則而抹去例外，敘述錯誤，故選 A。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 前段引《民法》第 6 條無誤，後段的推論卻與同法第 7 條牴觸，胎兒就個人利益之保護視為既已出生，錯在把原則講成沒有例外。\n(B) 《民法》第 16 條明定「權利能力及行為能力，不得拋棄」，權利能力是人作為權利主體的資格，與人格不可分，既不許拋棄，也無從讓與他人，敘述正確。\n(C) 《民法》第 26 條規定「法人於法令限制內，有享受權利負擔義務之能力。但專屬於自然人之權利義務，不在此限」，與本項所稱「除於法令或性質上之限制外」完全相符，敘述正確。\n(D) 植物人仍是生存中的自然人，死亡並未發生，依《民法》第 6 條其權利能力繼續存在；意識狀態影響的是行為能力與監護宣告（同法第 14 條），不是權利能力，敘述正確。\n【記憶點】權利能力「從出生到死亡」是原則，胎兒往前延伸是例外，植物人只是還沒走到終點。",true,[25,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":26,"stem":27,"number":28,"year":29,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-025","下列何者屬於當然無效之法律行為？",25,111,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-002","有關權利客體之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",2,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":29,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-024","關於財團法人之敘述，下列何者正確？",24,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-003","有關限制行為能力之敘述，下列何者正確？",3,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":29,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-023","滿 17 歲且未受監護或輔助宣告之甲男，其所為之下列何種行為，依法須得法定代理人之同意始為有效？",23,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-004","下列情形，那一行為需向法院聲請撤銷，才會發生撤銷之效力？",4,[51,55,59,62,66],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":13},"house-114-1-civil-law-001",114,"依我國民法有關死亡宣告之規定，下述何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":13},"house-113-1-civil-law-001",113,"甲就其所有之 A 地，先與乙訂立買賣契約，後與丙訂立買賣契約，均未辦理所有權移轉登記。關於二個買賣契約之效力，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":29,"stem":61,"number":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-001","依我國民法第 1173 條有關歸扣之規定，下列何種被繼承人生前將財產贈與某特定繼承人，無須將該贈與價額，於遺產分割時，由該繼承人之應繼分中扣除？",{"webId":63,"year":64,"stem":65,"number":13},"house-110-1-civil-law-001",110,"甲與乙訂立買賣契約，契約條款記載「…價金新臺幣陸拾捌萬元整（NT$860,000）。前揭捌拾陸萬元價金應於訂約後 10 日內支付。」若嗣後雙方就價金金額爭訟時，法院應如何決定價金？",{"webId":67,"year":68,"stem":69,"number":13},"house-109-1-civil-law-001",109,"下列關於法律上之物的敘述，何者正確？",1786689126484]