[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":70},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-111-1-civil-law-023":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-111-1-民法概要-023","house-111-1-civil-law-023",111,1,23,"滿 17 歲且未受監護或輔助宣告之甲男，其所為之下列何種行為，依法須得法定代理人之同意始為有效？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"訂立遺囑為遺贈之行為","純獲法律上利益之行為","就他人之物所為之無權處分行為","授予他人代理權之行為","D",null,"本題考點：限制行為能力人所為各類行為的效力，與須得法定代理人同意的界線。\n【正解理由】滿十七歲之未成年人，依《民法》第 13 條第二項有限制行為能力。授予他人代理權，依《民法》第 167 條應以意思表示為之；而依同法第 77 條本文，限制行為能力人為意思表示及受意思表示，應得法定代理人之允許，且授權行為屬單獨行為，依同法第 78 條，限制行為能力人未得法定代理人之允許所為之單獨行為無效，無從事後承認補正，故授予代理權須先得法定代理人同意始為有效，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 依《民法》第 1186 條第二項，限制行為能力人「無須經法定代理人之允許，得為遺囑」，僅未滿十六歲者不得為遺囑；甲已滿十七歲，得獨立以遺囑為遺贈。\n(B) 依《民法》第 77 條但書，純獲法律上利益之行為不在應得允許之限，無須同意即生效力。\n(C) 依《民法》第 118 條第一項，無權利人就權利標的物所為之處分，經「有權利人」之承認始生效力；其效力繫於有權利人是否承認，並非以法定代理人之同意為生效要件。\n(D) 正確。單獨行為未得允許即為無效（《民法》第 78 條），與契約未得允許尚得依同法第 79 條經法定代理人承認而生效者不同。\n【記憶點】滿十六歲遺囑自己立、純獲利益免同意、無權處分看權利人；授權是單獨行為，沒先得允許就無效。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-022","二人互負債務而其給付種類相同，並均屆清償期者，得以其債務與他方之債務互為下列何項主張，以消滅其債務？",22,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-024","關於財團法人之敘述，下列何者正確？",24,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-021","關於租賃法律關係之敘述，下列何者正確？",21,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-025","下列何者屬於當然無效之法律行為？",25,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-020","特定物買賣，若因物有瑕疵而出賣人依法應負物之瑕疵擔保責任時，下列何者非買受人依法所得主張之權利？",20,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":13,"year":49,"session":13},"house-112-1-civil-law-001","有關權利能力之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",112,[51,55,59,62,66],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-023",114,"依我國民法有關遺囑之規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-023",113,"甲男與乙女結婚後，並無任何子女。嗣後，甲男死亡，繼承人為乙與甲之父母丙丁。關於乙女之應繼分，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":49,"stem":61,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-023","關於遺產繼承之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":63,"year":64,"stem":65,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-023",110,"甲早年父母雙亡，僅有一兄長乙，甲與配偶離異後獨自養育一子丙。某日甲死亡，於丙拋棄繼承前，乙亦不幸意外死亡，留下乙之配偶丁。下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":67,"year":68,"stem":69,"number":14},"house-109-1-civil-law-023",109,"甲乙夫妻育有丙、丁二子及戊女。丙與己女結婚，婚後育有一子庚，戊女未婚生下一子辛。多年後甲死亡，而戊早於甲死亡，丙則拋棄繼承。設甲留有遺產 900 萬元，則甲之遺產應如何繼承？",1786689126937]