[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-111-1-civil-law-020":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-111-1-民法概要-020","house-111-1-civil-law-020",111,1,20,"特定物買賣，若因物有瑕疵而出賣人依法應負物之瑕疵擔保責任時，下列何者非買受人依法所得主張之權利？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"解除買賣契約","請求減少買賣價金","請求另行交付無瑕疵之物","故意不告知瑕疵時，請求損害賠償","C",null,"本題考點：物之瑕疵擔保責任的效果清單，以及「請求另行交付無瑕疵之物」只限於種類之物買賣。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 364 條第一項：「買賣之物，僅指定種類者，如其物有瑕疵，買受人得不解除契約或請求減少價金，而即時請求另行交付無瑕疵之物。」條文把這項請求權的前提限定在「僅指定種類」的買賣；特定物買賣的標的已經具體特定，無從另行交付，故不在買受人得主張之列，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 得主張。《民法》第 359 條本文規定買受人得解除其契約或請求減少其價金，但書另定依情形解除契約顯失公平者，買受人僅得請求減少價金。\n(B) 得主張。請求減少價金與解除契約同為《民法》第 359 條所定之效果。\n(C) 不得主張，為本題答案。《民法》第 364 條第一項以「僅指定種類」為要件，特定物買賣不適用。\n(D) 得主張。《民法》第 360 條規定買賣之物缺少出賣人所保證之品質者，買受人得不解除契約或請求減少價金，而請求不履行之損害賠償，出賣人故意不告知物之瑕疵者亦同。\n【記憶點】特定物只有解約、減價，加上保證品質或故意不告知時的損害賠償；另行交付專屬種類物。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-019","甲無權占有乙之土地種植果樹，其果實歸屬於何人？",19,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-021","關於租賃法律關係之敘述，下列何者正確？",21,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-018","甲將其 A 地設定地上權予乙，乙於 A 土地上興建 B 屋一棟。其後甲為貸款擔保而將其 A 地設定抵押權予丙，乙亦因其貸款擔保而將 B 屋設定抵押權予丁。下列敘述何者正確？",18,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-022","二人互負債務而其給付種類相同，並均屆清償期者，得以其債務與他方之債務互為下列何項主張，以消滅其債務？",22,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-017","關於夫妻法定財產制之規定，下列敘述何者正確？",17,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-civil-law-023","滿 17 歲且未受監護或輔助宣告之甲男，其所為之下列何種行為，依法須得法定代理人之同意始為有效？",23,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-020",114,"甲、乙結婚後未約定夫妻財產制時，下列有關甲、乙間之配偶財產關係之論述，何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-020",113,"民法就夫妻財產制採類型法定原則，下列何者並非我國現行民法規定之夫妻財產制類型？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-020",112,"關於善意占有人之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-020",110,"分別財產制有關夫妻債務的敘述，下列何者正確？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-109-1-civil-law-020",109,"下列關於夫妻財產制契約之訂立，何者正確？",1786689126909]