[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-111-1-brokerage-law-019":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-111-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-019","house-111-1-brokerage-law-019",111,1,19,"依公寓大廈管理條例之規定，區分所有權人或住戶積欠應繳納之公共基金或應分擔或其他應負擔之費用，至少逾多少期或達相當金額，經定相當期間催告仍不給付者，管理負責人或管理委員會得訴請法院命其給付應繳之金額及遲延利息？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"一期","二期","三期","六期","B",null,"本題考點：《公寓大廈管理條例》第 21 條，住戶積欠公共基金或應分擔費用時，管理組織訴請法院命其給付的門檻與程序。\n【正解理由】依《公寓大廈管理條例》第 21 條，區分所有權人或住戶積欠應繳納之公共基金或應分擔或其他應負擔之費用已逾二期或達相當金額，經定相當期間催告仍不給付者，管理負責人或管理委員會得訴請法院命其給付應繳之金額及遲延利息。條文所定的期數門檻為「已逾二期」，故選 B。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 一期低於條文門檻。《公寓大廈管理條例》第 21 條要求的是已逾二期或達相當金額，只欠一期尚未達到訴請給付的條件。\n(B) 二期與《公寓大廈管理條例》第 21 條所定「已逾二期」相符，且該條另有「或達相當金額」的並列選項，兩者具備其一即可，為本題答案。\n(C) 三期高於《公寓大廈管理條例》第 21 條的門檻，容易與《公寓大廈管理條例》第 22 條第 1 項促請改善後「於三個月內仍未改善」的期間相混。\n(D) 六期在《公寓大廈管理條例》第 21 條並無依據，該條並未以六期為訴請給付的條件。\n【記憶點】欠費逾二期、先定期催告，再訴請法院命給付本金加遲延利息。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-018","公寓大廈共用部分不得獨立使用供做專有部分。依公寓大廈管理條例之規定，其為特定情形者，並不得為約定專用部分。下列情形非屬前述之特定情形？",18,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-020","規約除應載明專有部分及共用部分範圍外，有特定之情形，非經載明於規約者，不生效力。下列敘述何者非屬之？",20,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-017","依公寓大廈管理條例之規定，下列之定義何者正確？",17,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-021","下列有關定型化契約條款敘述中那幾項是正確的？①企業經營者在定型化契約中所用之定型化契約條款如有疑義時，條款內容應本公平之解釋，不應偏向企業經營者或消費者 ②企業經營者在與消費者訂立定型化契約前，須至少提供三十日以內之合理審閱期間，供消費者審閱全部條款內容 ③企業經營者以定型化契約條款訂定之使消費者拋棄合理審閱期間之條款為有效條款 ④定型化契約中之主要權利或義務條款，因受條款之限制，致契約之目的難以達成者顯失公平，故為無效。",21,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-016","企業經營者在提供契約條款供他人參考時，下列那一種表示內容不會屬於定型化契約條款之一部分？",16,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-022","依消費者保護法第 17 條之規定，定型化契約應記載事項，依契約之性質及目的，其內容不包括下列那一項？",22,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-019",114,"依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，下列關於不動產經紀營業員之敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-019",113,"不動產經紀業者告知消費者「今天不簽約就沒機會」、「不簽約就不能看契約」、並在契約中記載「已確實攜回本契約書審閱 5 日以上無誤或是已詳閱並充分瞭解本契約書及附件內容，無須 5 日以上審閱期，本約簽訂後，確認即生契約效力無誤」，請問此定型化契約條款效力為何？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-019",112,"關於事業以不當提供贈品、贈獎之方法，爭取交易之機會，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-019",110,"依消費者保護法規定，關於小額消費爭議之調解，當事人之一方無正當理由，不於調解期日到場之處理方式為何？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-019",109,"消費者保護法針對企業經營者在定型化契約中所用之條款，有非常多的規定。下列敘述何者正確？",1786689134823]