[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":70},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-110-1-brokerage-law-025":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-110-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-025","house-110-1-brokerage-law-025",110,1,25,"依公平交易法規定，廣告相關業者與廣告主之間對於不實廣告應負之損害賠償責任，下列何者錯誤？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"專業人士或機構之廣告薦證者明知或可得而知其所從事之薦證有引人錯誤之虞，而仍為薦證者，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任","非屬知名公眾人物之廣告薦證者不知情其所從事之薦證有引人錯誤之虞，仍為薦證者，僅於受廣告主報酬十倍之範圍內，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任","廣告媒體業在明知或可得而知其所傳播或刊載之廣告有引人錯誤之虞，仍予傳播或刊載，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任","廣告代理業在明知或可得而知情形下，仍製作或設計有引人錯誤之廣告，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任","B",null,"本題考點：《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項不實廣告連帶賠償責任的主體與主觀要件。\n【正解理由】《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項後段規定，廣告薦證者「明知或可得而知其所從事之薦證有引人錯誤之虞，而仍為薦證者」，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任；但書則對非屬知名公眾人物、專業人士或機構之薦證者，設「僅於受廣告主報酬十倍之範圍內」的責任上限。十倍上限是在明知或可得而知的前提成立後才適用的減輕，並非把不知情者也拉進賠償範圍；選項以「不知情」為前提仍令其負連帶責任，與條文不符，故選 B。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 敘述正確。依《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項，專業人士或機構之薦證者明知或可得而知其薦證有引人錯誤之虞仍為薦證者，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任。\n(B) 敘述錯誤。《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項但書仍以「明知或可得而知」為前提，不知情者不負該項連帶賠償責任，十倍範圍只是責任上限。\n(C) 敘述正確。《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項明定廣告媒體業在明知或可得而知其所傳播或刊載之廣告有引人錯誤之虞，仍予傳播或刊載，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任。\n(D) 敘述正確。《公平交易法》第 21 條第五項明定廣告代理業在明知或可得而知情形下，仍製作或設計有引人錯誤之廣告，與廣告主負連帶損害賠償責任。\n【記憶點】三種業者都要先過「明知或可得而知」這關；十倍上限只給非知名公眾人物、非專業人士或機構的薦證者。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-024","有關公平交易法第 22 條對於事業仿冒行為要件之規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",24,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":13,"year":33,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-001","依不動產經紀業管理條例規定，不動產經紀業得請求退還原繳存之營業保證金之情形，不包含那一項？",111,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-023","經營代銷業務者，依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，應指派不動產經紀人簽章之文件，下列何者錯誤？",23,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":33,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-002","不動產經紀業管理條例對不動產經紀人員之規定，下列敘述何者正確？",2,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-022","不動產經紀業者倘與具競爭關係之事業，以契約、協議共同決定服務之價格、交易對象、交易地區等相互約束事業活動之行為，而足以影響服務供需之市場功能者，將構成公平交易法之何種行為？",22,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":33,"session":13},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-003","依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，經營仲介業務者應揭示於營業處所明顯之處的文件，不包含那一項？",3,[51,55,59,63,66],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-025",114,"依消費者保護法之規定，下列敘述何者正確？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-025",113,"依現行公寓大廈管理條例規定，公寓大廈住戶可以飼養動物？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-025",112,"關於消費者保護團體，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":33,"stem":65,"number":14},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-025","經紀業尚未與委託人簽訂委託契約書便刊登廣告及銷售時，依規定由直轄市、縣（市）主管機關處多少罰鍰？",{"webId":67,"year":68,"stem":69,"number":14},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-025",109,"公寓大廈專有部分以外之其他部分及不屬專有之附屬建築物，而供共同使用者，為共用部分。公寓大廈管理條例對於共用部分權利義務關係之規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",1786689135110]