[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-110-1-brokerage-law-019":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-110-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-019","house-110-1-brokerage-law-019",110,1,19,"依消費者保護法規定，關於小額消費爭議之調解，當事人之一方無正當理由，不於調解期日到場之處理方式為何？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"調解委員得斟酌一切情形，求兩造利益之平衡，於不違反兩造當事人之主要意思範圍內，依職權提出解決事件之方案，並送達於當事人。前項方案，應經參與調解委員過半數之同意","調解委員得斟酌一切情形，求兩造利益之平衡，於不違反兩造當事人之主要意思範圍內，依職權提出解決事件之方案，並送達於當事人。前項方案，應經全體調解委員過半數之同意","調解委員得審酌情形，依到場當事人一造之請求或依職權提出解決方案，並送達於當事人。前項方案，應經參與調解委員過半數之同意","調解委員得審酌情形，依到場當事人一造之請求或依職權提出解決方案，並送達於當事人。前項方案，應經全體調解委員過半數之同意","D",null,"本題考點：《消費者保護法》第 45-4 條小額消費爭議一造未到場時的職權方案，及其「全體調解委員過半數」的同意門檻。\n【正解理由】依《消費者保護法》第 45-4 條第一項，關於小額消費爭議，當事人之一方無正當理由，不於調解期日到場者，調解委員得審酌情形，依到場當事人一造之請求或依職權提出解決方案，並送達於當事人；《消費者保護法》第 45-4 條第二項規定，前項之方案，應經全體調解委員過半數之同意，並記載第 45-5 條所定異議期間及未於法定期間提出異議之法律效果。前後兩段都與選項 D 相符，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 錯誤。前段是《消費者保護法》第 45-2 條第一項「當事人不能合意但已甚接近」時的職權方案，適用情形不是一造未到場，同意門檻也是參與調解委員過半數。\n(B) 錯誤。前段同樣誤用《消費者保護法》第 45-2 條第一項的要件描述，縱使把門檻寫成全體調解委員過半數，仍與小額爭議一造未到場的情形對不上。\n(C) 錯誤。前段符合《消費者保護法》第 45-4 條第一項，但同意門檻寫成參與調解委員過半數，與《消費者保護法》第 45-4 條第二項的全體調解委員過半數不符。\n(D) 正確。要件與門檻都落在《消費者保護法》第 45-4 條第一項、第二項。\n【記憶點】甚接近用參與委員過半，小額又缺席用全體委員過半。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-018","依消費者保護法規定，各類企業經營者對消費者應負之損害賠償責任，下列敘述何者錯誤？",18,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-020","下列何者屬於公平交易法之適用範圍？",20,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-017","定型化契約中之定型化契約條款於下列何種情形下，其條款不構成契約之內容，但消費者得主張該條款仍構成契約之內容？",17,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-021","下列有關公平交易法對於事業聯合行為規定之敘述，何者錯誤？",21,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-016","依消費者保護法規定，下列有關通訊交易或訪問交易之消費者解除契約之敘述，何者正確？",16,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-022","不動產經紀業者倘與具競爭關係之事業，以契約、協議共同決定服務之價格、交易對象、交易地區等相互約束事業活動之行為，而足以影響服務供需之市場功能者，將構成公平交易法之何種行為？",22,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-019",114,"依不動產經紀業管理條例之規定，下列關於不動產經紀營業員之敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-019",113,"不動產經紀業者告知消費者「今天不簽約就沒機會」、「不簽約就不能看契約」、並在契約中記載「已確實攜回本契約書審閱 5 日以上無誤或是已詳閱並充分瞭解本契約書及附件內容，無須 5 日以上審閱期，本約簽訂後，確認即生契約效力無誤」，請問此定型化契約條款效力為何？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-019",112,"關於事業以不當提供贈品、贈獎之方法，爭取交易之機會，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-019",111,"依公寓大廈管理條例之規定，區分所有權人或住戶積欠應繳納之公共基金或應分擔或其他應負擔之費用，至少逾多少期或達相當金額，經定相當期間催告仍不給付者，管理負責人或管理委員會得訴請法院命其給付應繳之金額及遲延利息？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-109-1-brokerage-law-019",109,"消費者保護法針對企業經營者在定型化契約中所用之條款，有非常多的規定。下列敘述何者正確？",1786689135059]