[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-109-1-civil-law-007":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-109-1-民法概要-007","house-109-1-civil-law-007",109,1,7,"甲借給乙 100 萬元，借期屆至，甲請求乙返還 100 萬元借款，乙因此開立 100 萬元之本票交由甲受領。下列敘述，何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"甲所受領乙開立的 100 萬元本票，是債之內容更改","甲所受領乙開立的 100 萬元本票，是抵銷","甲所受領乙開立的 100 萬元本票，是代物清償","甲所受領乙開立的 100 萬元本票，是新債清償","D",null,"本題考點：為清償舊債務而另負新債務時舊債務是否消滅，亦即新債清償與代物清償之區辨。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 320 條，因清償債務而對於債權人負擔新債務者，除當事人另有意思表示外，若新債務不履行時，其舊債務仍不消滅。乙為清償 100 萬元借款而簽發同額本票交付甲，係對甲另負一個票據上的新債務，並非以他種給付直接代替原定給付，原借款債務並未因此消滅，此即新債清償，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 錯誤。債之更改以消滅舊債務、成立新債務為內容，須當事人有消滅舊債務之意思；單純簽發本票通常僅為便利清償，不足以認定有此意思。\n(B) 錯誤。抵銷須二人互負債務、給付種類相同且均屆清償期，本件乙對甲並無可供對衝之債權，欠缺互負債務的前提。\n(C) 錯誤。《民法》第 319 條所定代物清償，係債權人受領他種給付以代原定之給付，其債之關係即歸消滅；本件甲受領本票後借款債務仍然存續，與該條之效果不符。\n(D) 正確，為本題所選。所負者是新債務而非終局之給付，符合《民法》第 320 條「因清償債務而對於債權人負擔新債務」之要件。\n【記憶點】收到本票不等於收到錢：票款未獲清償前，原來的借款債務還在。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-civil-law-006","下列有關定金之敘述，何者正確？",6,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-civil-law-008","下列關於房屋租賃之敘述，何者正確？",8,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-civil-law-005","下列關於利息之敘述，何者正確？",5,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-civil-law-009","甲將其名下之房屋出售並交付乙占有，惟尚未辦理所有權登記之前，甲又出售該屋於善意之丙且辦理所有權登記完畢。則乙對丙之主張，下列何者正確？",9,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-civil-law-004","下列有關契約成立之敘述，何者錯誤？",4,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-109-1-civil-law-010","甲將其土地出售乙，但因價金給付方式仍有爭議，故甲拒絕交付予乙，亦不辦理登記，乙起訴請求甲履行買賣契約之給付義務，經判決勝訴確定。下列敘述，何者正確？",10,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-007",114,"不同之權利主體以法律行為方式，形成了彼此間之法律關係。嗣後，當事人一方發現自己已為之意思表示發生錯誤，乃依民法第 88 條規定行使撤銷權。下列相關之敘述，何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-007",113,"甲與乙訂立租賃契約，將丙所有之 A 屋出租於乙，並交付於乙。嗣後，丙對乙起訴，請求乙返還 A 屋，致乙不能為約定之使用，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-007",112,"依民法之規定，約定利率超過週年百分之多少，則超過之部分會無效？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-007",111,"在無因管理之規定中，若管理人管理事務時，利於本人，且不違反本人明示或可得推知之意思者，管理人不得向本人主張下列那種請求權？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-007",110,"關於意思表示不一致的敘述，下列何者正確？",1786689127250]