[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-106-1-civil-law-037":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-106-1-民法概要-037","house-106-1-civil-law-037",106,1,37,"下列有關抵押權之敘述，何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"以抵押權擔保之債權請求權，雖經時效消滅，債權人仍得於時效完成後 5 年內實行抵押權","以建築物為抵押者，其附加部分亦為抵押權效力所及，應一律併付拍賣","抵押權人聲請查封抵押物，惟該執行名義嗣後經抗告法院裁定予以廢棄確定時，抵押人可依法請求財產上及非財產上損害賠償","抵押權人於債權清償期屆滿後，為受清償，不得訂立契約取得抵押物之所有權","A",null,"本題考點：擔保債權時效完成後抵押權的存續期間，以及附加建物併付拍賣與流抵約款的效力。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 880 條，以抵押權擔保之債權，其請求權已因時效而消滅，如抵押權人於消滅時效完成後，五年間不實行其抵押權者，其抵押權消滅。反面言之，債權請求權雖已罹於時效，抵押權人仍得於時效完成後五年內實行抵押權而受清償，故選 A。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 這五年是抵押權的存續期間，期間內實行抵押權仍屬有效，期間經過抵押權才歸於消滅。\n(B) 依《民法》第 862 條第三項，以建築物為抵押者，其附加於該建築物而不具獨立性之部分，亦為抵押權效力所及；但附加部分為獨立之物且係於抵押權設定後附加者，準用《民法》第 877 條，抵押權人於必要時始得於強制執行程序中聲請併付拍賣，且對該建築物之價金無優先受清償之權，並非一律併付拍賣。\n(C) 非財產上損害的賠償，須以法律有特別規定者為限；抵押權人依當時有效之執行名義聲請查封，該執行名義事後遭裁定廢棄，屬強制執行程序回復的問題，抵押人不因此當然取得慰撫金請求權。\n(D) 依《民法》第 873-1 條第一項，約定於債權已屆清償期而未為清償時，抵押物之所有權移屬於抵押權人者，非經登記，不得對抗第三人；可見此種約定並非不得訂立，僅生對抗要件的限制。\n【記憶點】債權時效完成，抵押權還有五年壽命；流抵約款不是禁止，是要登記才能對抗第三人。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-036","下列有關租賃契約之敘述，何者錯誤？",36,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-038","下列有關契約解除之敘述，何者錯誤？",38,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-035","下列有關意思表示之敘述，何者錯誤？",35,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-039","下列有關相鄰關係之敘述，何者錯誤？",39,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-034","下列有關繼承之敘述，何者錯誤？",34,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-040","下列有關人格權之敘述，何者錯誤？",40,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-105-1-civil-law-037",105,"依我國民法之規定，當胎兒為繼承人時，他繼承人如未保留胎兒之應繼分而分割遺產者，其分割行為之效力如何？",1786689128236]