[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-106-1-civil-law-036":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-106-1-民法概要-036","house-106-1-civil-law-036",106,1,36,"下列有關租賃契約之敘述，何者錯誤？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"租賃關係存續中，出租人未使租賃物合於約定使用收益狀態，致承租人未達租賃目的者，承租人得拒絕給付租金","出租人將已交付承租人之租賃物的所有權讓與他人，承租人與受讓人間仍須另立租賃契約始發生租賃關係","定有期限之租賃契約，當事人約定得提前終止者，於終止契約前應先期通知","租賃契約經公證並附有逕受強制執行條款者，當承租人有不付租金、租期屆滿拒不搬遷，或房東不返還押租金時，當事人可直接申請強制執行","B",null,"本題考點：買賣不破租賃的效力，以及出租人的保持義務與期前終止的先期通知。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 425 條第一項，出租人於租賃物交付後，承租人占有中，縱將其所有權讓與第三人，其租賃契約，對於受讓人仍繼續存在。租賃關係是依法律規定直接對受讓人存續，受讓人概括承受出租人地位，不待當事人另立租賃契約，敘述與條文不合，故選 B。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 依《民法》第 423 條，出租人應以合於所約定使用收益之租賃物交付承租人，並應於租賃關係存續中保持其合於約定使用、收益之狀態；出租人未履行此項義務者，其對待給付未依債之本旨提出，承租人得拒絕給付租金。本項正確。\n(B) 受讓人於取得所有權時一併承受出租人的地位，這正是買賣不破租賃的意義所在。\n(C) 依《民法》第 453 條，定有期限之租賃契約，如約定當事人之一方於期限屆滿前得終止契約者，其終止契約應先期通知。本項正確。\n(D) 租賃契約經公證並載明應逕受強制執行者，依《公證法》的規定得作為執行名義，租金給付、租賃物返還與押租金返還均在其列。本項正確。\n【記憶點】租賃物易主，租約跟著房子走；約定期前終止，終止前要先講一聲。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-035","下列有關意思表示之敘述，何者錯誤？",35,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-037","下列有關抵押權之敘述，何者正確？",37,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-034","下列有關繼承之敘述，何者錯誤？",34,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-038","下列有關契約解除之敘述，何者錯誤？",38,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-033","下列有關遺產分割之敘述，何者錯誤？",33,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-039","下列有關相鄰關係之敘述，何者錯誤？",39,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-105-1-civil-law-036",105,"隱瞞已婚之乙女與甲同居數年後，某日生下丙隨即離甲而去，甲獨力扶養丙，俟丙 19 歲生日，甲對丙告知其生母為乙，當日丙因思母心切隨即趕赴乙家要求相認，相認時刻被乙女丈夫丁撞見，一切東窗事發，乙丁大吵。過了 2 年後，上述相關人等決心為此事作一了結。試問此刻以下何人有資格提起婚生否認之訴？",1786689128229]