[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-106-1-civil-law-007":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-106-1-民法概要-007","house-106-1-civil-law-007",106,1,7,"關於消滅時效，下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"消滅時效之規定，已登記不動產之回復請求權，亦有適用","一般消滅時效期間，乃 20 年","請求權因其消滅時效完成而消滅","以租賃動產為營業者之租價請求權，其消滅時效期間為 2 年","D",null,"本題考點：消滅時效的期間類型與時效完成後的法律效果。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 127 條第三款，以租賃動產為營業者之租價，其請求權因二年間不行使而消滅。該款把租賃動產營業的租價明列為二年短期時效的客體，與選項所述完全相符，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 已登記之不動產，其所有人之回復請求權依實務見解並無消滅時效規定之適用，因為登記本身持續表彰權利狀態，若容任時效完成將使登記名義與權利歸屬長期背離，敘述錯誤。\n(B) 依《民法》第 125 條，請求權因十五年間不行使而消滅，但法律所定期間較短者依其規定，一般消滅時效期間是十五年而非二十年，敘述錯誤。\n(C) 依《民法》第 144 條第一項，時效完成後債務人得拒絕給付，消滅時效完成所生者為債務人的拒絕給付抗辯權，請求權本身並不因此消滅；同條第二項並規定債務人仍為履行之給付者，不得以不知時效為理由請求返還，敘述錯誤。\n(D) 與《民法》第 127 條第三款完全吻合，該條以二年為期，第三款所列即為以租賃動產為營業者之租價，敘述正確。\n【記憶點】十五年是原則，二年是清單，時效完成給的是抗辯權不是消滅權。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-006","甲有 A 地，且登記為 A 地所有人。甲因乙之脅迫，出賣且交付 A 地於乙，於甲尚未撤銷買賣契約前。試問，下列敘述何者正確？",6,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-008","依民法規定，關於不動產買賣，下列敘述何者正確？",8,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-005","關於意思表示錯誤，下列敘述何者正確？",5,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-009","甲有 A 屋，登記為 A 屋所有人。甲將 A 屋贈與乙女。試問，下列敘述何者正確？",9,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-004","關於繼承之效力，下列敘述何者錯誤？",4,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-civil-law-010","依民法規定，關於受任人之權利及義務，下列敘述何者正確？",10,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-007",114,"不同之權利主體以法律行為方式，形成了彼此間之法律關係。嗣後，當事人一方發現自己已為之意思表示發生錯誤，乃依民法第 88 條規定行使撤銷權。下列相關之敘述，何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-007",113,"甲與乙訂立租賃契約，將丙所有之 A 屋出租於乙，並交付於乙。嗣後，丙對乙起訴，請求乙返還 A 屋，致乙不能為約定之使用，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-007",112,"依民法之規定，約定利率超過週年百分之多少，則超過之部分會無效？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-007",111,"在無因管理之規定中，若管理人管理事務時，利於本人，且不違反本人明示或可得推知之意思者，管理人不得向本人主張下列那種請求權？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-007",110,"關於意思表示不一致的敘述，下列何者正確？",1786689127959]