[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-106-1-brokerage-law-029":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-106-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-029","house-106-1-brokerage-law-029",106,1,29,"依消費者保護法規定，企業經營者對消費者保證商品或服務品質所出具之書面保證書，應載明事項不包括下列何者？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"商品或服務之名稱","保證之內容","製造日期","製造商之名稱、地址","C",null,"本題考點：《消費者保護法》第 25 條書面保證書的六款法定應載明事項，屬典型的列舉背誦題。\n【正解理由】依《消費者保護法》第 25 條第二項，保證書應載明「一、商品或服務之名稱、種類、數量，其有製造號碼或批號者，其製造號碼或批號。二、保證之內容。三、保證期間及其起算方法。四、製造商之名稱、地址。五、由經銷商售出者，經銷商之名稱、地址。六、交易日期」；六款裡與日期有關的只有交易日期，與製造有關的只有製造號碼或批號及製造商名稱地址，並無製造日期一項，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 屬應載明事項，見《消費者保護法》第 25 條第二項第一款，商品或服務之名稱與種類、數量並列。\n(B) 屬應載明事項，見《消費者保護法》第 25 條第二項第二款，保證的內容須具體寫明。\n(C) 不屬應載明事項。《消費者保護法》第 25 條第二項第六款要的是交易日期，第一款要的是製造號碼或批號，都不是製造日期，為本題答案。\n(D) 屬應載明事項，見《消費者保護法》第 25 條第二項第四款，製造商之名稱與地址。\n【記憶點】保證書六款背成「名稱種類數量、保證內容、期間起算、製造商、經銷商、交易日期」，日期欄只認交易日期。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-027","下列何者非屬於內政部依消費者保護法之規定所訂定之定型化契約應記載不得記載事項類型？",27,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-030","依消費者保護法規定，關於定型化契約之審閱期間，下列敘述何者錯誤？",30,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-026","下列何者不是消費者保護法第 12 條所規定推定定型化契約條款顯失公平之情形？",26,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-031","依消費者保護法規定，關於特種交易之敘述何者正確？",31,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-025","輸入之商品或服務，須以何種方式為之？",25,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-032","定型化契約中之定型化契約條款牴觸個別磋商條款之約定者，其牴觸部分？",32,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-029",105,"依消費者保護法規定，定型化契約條款於下列何種情形，可認為並非違反平等互惠原則？",1786689135995]