[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-106-1-brokerage-law-021":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-106-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-021","house-106-1-brokerage-law-021",106,1,21,"下列何者非反托拉斯法基金之用途？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"辦理競爭法之教育及宣傳","補助本法與涉及檢舉獎金訴訟案件相關費用之支出","推動國際競爭法執法機關之合作","補助消費者因聯合行為而受之損害","D",null,"本題考點：《公平交易法》第 47-1 條反托拉斯基金的法定用途列舉，找出不屬於用途者。\n【正解理由】依《公平交易法》第 47-1 條第三項，基金之用途如下：一、檢舉違法聯合行為獎金之支出。二、推動國際競爭法執法機關之合作、調查及交流事項。三、補助本法與涉及檢舉獎金訴訟案件相關費用之支出。四、辦理競爭法相關資料庫之建置及維護。五、辦理競爭法相關制度之研究發展。六、辦理競爭法之教育及宣導。七、其他維護市場交易秩序之必要支出。七款之中並無補助消費者因聯合行為所受損害這一項，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 屬於用途。對應《公平交易法》第 47-1 條第三項第六款「辦理競爭法之教育及宣導」。\n(B) 屬於用途。對應《公平交易法》第 47-1 條第三項第三款「補助本法與涉及檢舉獎金訴訟案件相關費用之支出」。\n(C) 屬於用途。對應《公平交易法》第 47-1 條第三項第二款「推動國際競爭法執法機關之合作、調查及交流事項」。\n(D) 非用途。第一款支出的對象是檢舉違法聯合行為的檢舉人獎金，不是受害的消費者；受害人循《公平交易法》第 30 條向違法事業請求損害賠償，並得依該法第 33 條請求由侵害人負擔費用將判決書內容登載新聞紙。\n【記憶點】基金養的是檢舉人與執法能量，不是賠償受害人的口袋。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-020","不動產開發業者或不動產經紀業者銷售預售屋時，要求購屋人須給付定金或一定費用始提供預售屋買賣契約書攜回審閱，可能違反公平交易法之何種行為？",20,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-022","依公平交易法規定，下列關於期間之敘述何者錯誤？",22,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-019","甲建設公司請乙廣告公司針對新推出之建案，宣傳其公共設施包含三溫暖及健身房，並請知名女星丙推薦該建案。然該建案依使用執照登載所示，廣告中宣傳該公共設施位置之使用用途為「梯間、水箱及機械室」且未辦理變更使用執照。使該建案於日後交屋時，消費者並未能獲得或合法享有廣告所示之公共設施空間使用。根據公平交易法，下列敘述何者錯誤？",19,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-024","依消費者保護法規定，關於企業經營者責任之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",24,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-018","依公平交易法第 20 條之規定，妨害公平競爭之行為不包括下列何者？",18,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-025","輸入之商品或服務，須以何種方式為之？",25,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-021",114,"依公平交易法之規定，法院因事業違反該法之規定，致侵害他人權益者，被害人之請求，如為事業之故意行為，得依侵害情節，酌定損害額以上之賠償。但不得超過已證明損害額之幾倍？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-021",113,"下列何者不是定型化契約條款推定顯失公平之情形？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-021",112,"依消費者保護法規定，有關定型化契約應記載或不得記載事項之規定，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-021",111,"下列有關定型化契約條款敘述中那幾項是正確的？①企業經營者在定型化契約中所用之定型化契約條款如有疑義時，條款內容應本公平之解釋，不應偏向企業經營者或消費者 ②企業經營者在與消費者訂立定型化契約前，須至少提供三十日以內之合理審閱期間，供消費者審閱全部條款內容 ③企業經營者以定型化契約條款訂定之使消費者拋棄合理審閱期間之條款為有效條款 ④定型化契約中之主要權利或義務條款，因受條款之限制，致契約之目的難以達成者顯失公平，故為無效。",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-021",110,"下列有關公平交易法對於事業聯合行為規定之敘述，何者錯誤？",1786689135946]