[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-civil-law-033":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-民法概要-033","house-105-1-civil-law-033",105,1,33,"有關夫妻財產制的規定，下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"依民法規定，夫妻除可以選擇分別財產制及共同財產制外，亦得基於契約自由原則，選擇其他分配方式","夫妻選擇分別財產制，將來離婚時仍有剩餘財產分配請求權之適用","夫妻選擇共同財產制後，可以再變更為分別財產制，互相轉換並無次數上的限制","夫妻因未約定夫妻財產制而採用法定財產制時，將來就不得任意再變更","C",null,"本題考點：夫妻財產制的選擇範圍、變更自由，以及剩餘財產分配請求權的適用前提。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 1012 條，夫妻於婚姻關係存續中，得以契約廢止其財產契約，或改用他種約定財產制。條文對變更之次數並未設任何上限，也未要求須經法院許可，因此已選用共同財產制之夫妻仍得再以契約改用分別財產制，日後亦得再行轉換，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 錯誤。《民法》第 1004 條明定夫妻僅得就「本法所定之約定財產制」中選擇其一，選擇範圍受法定類型拘束，不得援引契約自由另創其他分配方式。\n(B) 錯誤。《民法》第 1030-1 條第一項的適用前提是「法定財產制關係消滅時」，剩餘財產分配請求權只依附於法定財產制；選用分別財產制之夫妻離婚時並無此項請求權。\n(C) 正確。《民法》第 1012 條允許婚姻關係存續中廢止原財產契約或改用他種約定財產制，且未設次數限制，與本項敘述相符。\n(D) 錯誤。《民法》第 1004 條既明定得於「結婚後」以契約選擇約定財產制，原因未約定而適用法定財產制之夫妻，仍得嗣後訂約改用，並非自此不得變更。\n【記憶點】選哪一種有限制、改幾次沒限制；剩餘財產分配只跟著法定財產制走。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-032","下列何者非屬我國現行民法中所規定之約定財產制？",32,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-034","有關法定夫妻財產制之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",34,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-031","下列何者違反近親禁婚範圍之規定？",31,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-035","下列何者屬於剩餘財產分配請求權之標的財產？",35,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-030","有關動產善意受讓要件之說明，下列敘述何者正確？",30,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-036","隱瞞已婚之乙女與甲同居數年後，某日生下丙隨即離甲而去，甲獨力扶養丙，俟丙 19 歲生日，甲對丙告知其生母為乙，當日丙因思母心切隨即趕赴乙家要求相認，相認時刻被乙女丈夫丁撞見，一切東窗事發，乙丁大吵。過了 2 年後，上述相關人等決心為此事作一了結。試問此刻以下何人有資格提起婚生否認之訴？",36,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-106-1-civil-law-033",106,"下列有關遺產分割之敘述，何者錯誤？",1786689128543]