[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-civil-law-030":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-民法概要-030","house-105-1-civil-law-030",105,1,30,"有關動產善意受讓要件之說明，下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"讓與人與受讓人須完成讓與動產之交付行為，此之交付不包含觀念交付","受讓人出於善意且有抽象輕過失者，不受占有之保護","讓與人必須是無權代理","盜贓物為金錢時，被害人不得向善意占有人請求回復","D",null,"本題考點：動產善意受讓的要件與其例外，核心條文是《民法》第 948 條、第 801 條與盜贓遺失物的回復規定。\n【正解理由】《民法》第 951 條規定「盜贓、遺失物或其他非基於原占有人之意思而喪失其占有之物，如係金錢或未記載權利人之有價證券，不得向其善意受讓之現占有人請求回復」。金錢屬高度流通之物，該條明文排除回復請求，被害人不得向善意占有人請求回復，故選 D。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 《民法》第 761 條第二項、第三項承認以占有改定及讓與返還請求權代交付，《民法》第 948 條第二項並僅就依第 761 條第二項所為之受讓，要求受讓人受現實交付且交付時善意，可見觀念交付並未被全面排除，敘述錯誤。\n(B) 《民法》第 948 條第一項但書所定的阻卻事由是受讓人「明知或因重大過失而不知」讓與人無讓與之權利，抽象輕過失仍受占有規定之保護，敘述錯誤。\n(C) 依《民法》第 948 條第一項及第 801 條，善意受讓的前提是讓與人「無讓與之權利」，即無權處分，與無權代理是兩回事，敘述錯誤。\n(D) 與《民法》第 951 條相符，敘述正確。\n【記憶點】重大過失才擋善意受讓；盜贓遺失物二年內可追，但金錢與未記載權利人之有價證券追不回來。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-029","有關惡意占有人與善意占有人，在損害賠償請求方面，下列敘述何者正確？",29,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-031","下列何者違反近親禁婚範圍之規定？",31,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-028","乙將其所有汽車為甲設定動產質權，以為其對甲借款債務之擔保。該車並已交付甲之占有。下列那種情形，甲之動產質權並不消滅？",28,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-032","下列何者非屬我國現行民法中所規定之約定財產制？",32,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-027","有關抵押權之實行，下列敘述何者正確？",27,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-033","有關夫妻財產制的規定，下列敘述何者正確？",33,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-106-1-civil-law-030",106,"19 歲之甲經父母同意受僱於乙公司。某日甲受乙公司之吩咐，將貨物送到客戶手中。途中行經十字路口，甲闖紅燈致丙在綠燈穿越時受傷，經該地區行車事故鑑定委員會認定，認定甲應負全部之肇事責任。就此情形，下列敘述何者錯誤？",1786689128514]