[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-civil-law-018":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"民法概要","civil-law","民法概要 · Civil Law","民法","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-民法概要-018","house-105-1-civil-law-018",105,1,18,"甲將透天厝（不含基地）立約賣給乙後，尚未交付予乙前，即逢超級強烈颱風來襲，致透天厝完全倒塌。下列敘述何者正確？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"乙免給付價金予甲","甲仍負有交屋之義務","甲仍得請求乙支付價金","乙得向甲主張侵權行為","A",null,"本題考點：買賣標的物在交付前因不可歸責於雙方之事由滅失時，價金危險由誰承擔。\n【正解理由】依《民法》第 373 條，買賣標的物之利益及危險，自交付時起，均由買受人承受負擔，但契約另有訂定者，不在此限。本題透天厝尚未交付即因超級強烈颱風全部倒塌，危險仍停留在出賣人甲一方；房屋滅失屬不可歸責於雙方當事人之給付不能，依《民法》第 266 條第一項，因不可歸責於雙方當事人之事由，致一方之給付全部不能者，他方免為對待給付之義務，乙因此不必再給付價金，故選 A。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 甲的交屋給付因不可歸責於雙方之事由而全部不能，依《民法》第 266 條第一項，乙免為對待給付，本項正確。\n(B) 依《民法》第 225 條第一項，因不可歸責於債務人之事由，致給付不能者，債務人免給付義務，房屋既已完全倒塌，甲的交屋義務已消滅。\n(C) 危險依《民法》第 373 條須自交付時起才移轉予買受人，本件尚未交付，甲不得再請求乙支付價金。\n(D) 房屋倒塌肇因於颱風，甲對此既無故意亦無過失，不符《民法》第 184 條第一項前段不法侵害他人之權利的要件。\n【記憶點】危險跟著「交付」跑，交付前屋毀，雙方的義務一起歸零。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-017","若買賣標的物為特定物時，買受人不得請求下列那一種物的瑕疵擔保之法定效果？",17,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-019","有關贈與契約之敘述，下列何者正確？",19,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-016","有關民法第 250 條規定之違約金類型有「損害賠償總額預定違約金」與「懲罰性違約金」兩種，下列敘述何者正確？",16,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-020","依民法之規定，承租人因下列何種情形致失火而使租賃物毀損、滅失者，應對出租人負損害賠償責任？",20,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-015","依侵權行為請求損害賠償之說明，下列敘述何者正確？",15,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-civil-law-021","有關物權之優先性，在同一標的物下，下列敘述何者正確？",21,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-civil-law-018",114,"關於占有，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-civil-law-018",113,"甲向乙銀行借貸新臺幣 1000 萬元，並以甲所有之 A 屋為乙設定普通抵押權。嗣後，因第三人丙之過失，致 A 屋滅失，下列敘述，何者正確？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-civil-law-018",112,"關於民法區分所有建築物規定之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-civil-law-018",111,"甲將其 A 地設定地上權予乙，乙於 A 土地上興建 B 屋一棟。其後甲為貸款擔保而將其 A 地設定抵押權予丙，乙亦因其貸款擔保而將 B 屋設定抵押權予丁。下列敘述何者正確？",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-civil-law-018",110,"依民法第 880 條規定，實行抵押權期間以抵押權擔保之債權，其請求權已因時效而消滅，如抵押權人，於消滅時效完成後，幾年間不實行其抵押權者，其抵押權消滅？",1786689128414]