[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":55},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-brokerage-law-030":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-030","house-105-1-brokerage-law-030",105,1,30,"甲於乙商店購得丙手機公司所生產之新型手機，甲交予其子丁使用，詎料丁於使用時竟發生手機電池燃燒，致丁受傷送醫。依消費者保護法規定，關於本案中企業經營者責任之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"丙公司係生產問題手機之企業經營者，應確保該手機符合當時科技或專業水準可合理期待之安全性，如有違反，應負損害賠償責任","該問題手機雖係甲所購買，但如丁因使用而身體受損害，丙公司仍應對丁負損害賠償責任","若丙公司能證明其於生產手機時無過失者，法院應免除其賠償責任","經銷手機之乙商店，就使用問題手機所生損害，與丙公司連帶負損害賠償責任。但乙商店得主張對損害之防免已盡相當之注意，或縱加以相當之注意而仍不免發生損害，以免除其與丙公司之連帶責任","C",null,"本題考點：商品責任的主體與免責界線，重點在製造者能證明無過失時法院究竟是減輕還是免除其賠償責任。\n【正解理由】依《消費者保護法》第 7 條第三項，企業經營者違反前二項規定，致生損害於消費者或第三人時，應負連帶賠償責任，但書則是「企業經營者能證明其無過失者，法院得減輕其賠償責任」。條文給的是法院裁量減輕，不是應免除，本選項與條文不符，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 敘述正確。《消費者保護法》第 7 條第一項要求從事設計、生產、製造商品之企業經營者，於提供商品流通進入市場時，應確保商品符合當時科技或專業水準可合理期待之安全性，丙公司生產手機即屬之。\n(B) 敘述正確。《消費者保護法》第 7 條第三項的賠償對象包含「第三人」，丁雖非買受人，因使用而身體受損害仍在保護範圍內。\n(C) 敘述錯誤，為本題所選。無過失的證明依《消費者保護法》第 7 條第三項但書只能換到法院「得減輕」，並無應免除的效果。\n(D) 敘述正確。《消費者保護法》第 8 條第一項規定經銷之企業經營者與製造者連帶負賠償責任，但其對於損害之防免已盡相當之注意，或縱加以相當之注意而仍不免發生損害者，不在此限，乙商店確得據以主張。\n【記憶點】製造者證明無過失只能減輕，經銷者盡了相當注意才有機會脫身。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-029","依消費者保護法規定，定型化契約條款於下列何種情形，可認為並非違反平等互惠原則？",29,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-031","關於公寓大廈住戶行為規範之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",31,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-028","企業經營者於下列違反消費者保護法之情形，何者所適用罰則所定之法定罰鍰額度為最高？",28,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-032","依公寓大廈管理條例規定，區分所有權人召開定期會議之頻率為：",32,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-027","針對臺灣社會發生食品安全問題（如黑心油），消費者得依消費者保護法第 50 條所定消費者保護團體訴訟（以下簡稱「消保團體訴訟」）尋求救濟。下列敘述何者正確？",27,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-033","公寓大廈內連通數個專有部分之樓梯間，依公寓大廈管理條例相關規定屬於何種型態？",33,[51],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-106-1-brokerage-law-030",106,"依消費者保護法規定，關於定型化契約之審閱期間，下列敘述何者錯誤？",1786689136324]