[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":71},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-house-105-1-brokerage-law-021":3},{"subject":4,"subjectSlug":5,"subjectKicker":6,"subjectShort":7,"subjectMcqNote":8,"question":9,"related":25,"sameNumber":50,"hasEssay":24},"不動產經紀相關法規概要","brokerage-law","經紀相關法規 · Brokerage Regulation","經紀相關法規","105–106 年 40 題(每題 1.25 分)、107 年起 25 題(每題 2 分)",{"id":10,"webId":11,"year":12,"session":13,"subject":4,"number":14,"stem":15,"options":16,"answer":21,"answerNote":22,"lawYear":12,"explanation":23,"freq":13,"indexable":24},"house-105-1-不動產經紀相關法規概要-021","house-105-1-brokerage-law-021",105,1,21,"甲向乙建設公司購買預售屋，雙方以書面訂立買賣定型化契約，關於本契約可能產生法律爭議之敘述，下列何者錯誤？",{"A":17,"B":18,"C":19,"D":20},"若契約條款約定買方需繳回契約書，則該條款無效","若買賣雙方經個別磋商後約定契約審閱期間為 20 日，但契約定型化條款仍記載「買方享有 5 日之契約審閱期間」者，該條款牴觸個別磋商條款之部分為無效","若賣方乙公司於訂約時，突然口頭告知要求甲應同意：「如買方逾期繳交各期預售屋價金時，即視為違約，已繳交之價金不予退還」，甲未置可否仍簽下書面契約。由於契約訂立不限於書面要式，雖然乙之口頭內容未經記載於定型化契約中，但該口頭告知仍構成契約之條款而有效","若契約條款約定本案預售屋廣告僅供參考，則該條款無效","C",null,"本題考點：定型化契約條款的效力規則——個別磋商優先、異常條款不入約與廣告責任。\n【正解理由】依《消費者保護法》第 14 條，「定型化契約條款未經記載於定型化契約中而依正常情形顯非消費者所得預見者，該條款不構成契約之內容」。訂約時始以口頭附加沒收已繳價金的內容，既未記載於契約，依正常情形亦非消費者所得預見，自不構成契約之內容。(C) 反謂其仍構成契約條款而有效，與該條不符，為錯誤敘述，故選 C。\n【逐項排除】\n(A) 依《消費者保護法》第 13 條第三項，定型化契約書經消費者簽名或蓋章者，企業經營者應給與消費者正本；約定買方須繳回契約書者，剝奪消費者持有契約以行使權利之地位，屬同法第 12 條第一項顯失公平之條款而無效，本項正確。\n(B) 《消費者保護法》第 15 條規定定型化契約條款牴觸個別磋商條款之約定者，其牴觸部分無效，審閱期 20 日與 5 日之差即屬牴觸，本項正確。\n(C) 未記載於定型化契約之口頭條款依《消費者保護法》第 14 條不構成契約之內容，本項與條文相反，即為錯誤選項。\n(D) 依《消費者保護法》第 22 條第一項，企業經營者應確保廣告內容之真實，其對消費者所負之義務不得低於廣告之內容；把廣告降為僅供參考之條款使義務低於廣告內容，依同法第 12 條第一項顯失公平而無效，本項正確。\n【記憶點】定型化契約四訣：磋商優先、異常不入約、廣告即義務、正本要給消費者。",true,[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"webId":27,"stem":28,"number":29,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-020","關於不動產經紀業者之行為，下列何者係法律所允許？",20,{"webId":31,"stem":32,"number":33,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-022","關於消費爭議調解委員會的敘述，下列何者正確？",22,{"webId":35,"stem":36,"number":37,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-019","公平交易法所規範不動產經紀業者涉及違法聯合行為之態樣，下列何者不屬之？",19,{"webId":39,"stem":40,"number":41,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-023","依消費者保護法規定，企業經營者與消費者分期付款買賣契約的敘述，下列何者正確？",23,{"webId":43,"stem":44,"number":45,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-018","下列何種情形，係屬於公平交易法所稱之結合？",18,{"webId":47,"stem":48,"number":49,"year":12,"session":13},"house-105-1-brokerage-law-024","未經消費者要約而對之郵寄或投遞之商品，寄送人未經消費者通知取回，在寄送後逾多少時間未經消費者表示承諾，而仍不取回其商品者，視為拋棄其寄投之商品：",24,[51,55,59,63,67],{"webId":52,"year":53,"stem":54,"number":14},"house-114-1-brokerage-law-021",114,"依公平交易法之規定，法院因事業違反該法之規定，致侵害他人權益者，被害人之請求，如為事業之故意行為，得依侵害情節，酌定損害額以上之賠償。但不得超過已證明損害額之幾倍？",{"webId":56,"year":57,"stem":58,"number":14},"house-113-1-brokerage-law-021",113,"下列何者不是定型化契約條款推定顯失公平之情形？",{"webId":60,"year":61,"stem":62,"number":14},"house-112-1-brokerage-law-021",112,"依消費者保護法規定，有關定型化契約應記載或不得記載事項之規定，下列何者正確？",{"webId":64,"year":65,"stem":66,"number":14},"house-111-1-brokerage-law-021",111,"下列有關定型化契約條款敘述中那幾項是正確的？①企業經營者在定型化契約中所用之定型化契約條款如有疑義時，條款內容應本公平之解釋，不應偏向企業經營者或消費者 ②企業經營者在與消費者訂立定型化契約前，須至少提供三十日以內之合理審閱期間，供消費者審閱全部條款內容 ③企業經營者以定型化契約條款訂定之使消費者拋棄合理審閱期間之條款為有效條款 ④定型化契約中之主要權利或義務條款，因受條款之限制，致契約之目的難以達成者顯失公平，故為無效。",{"webId":68,"year":69,"stem":70,"number":14},"house-110-1-brokerage-law-021",110,"下列有關公平交易法對於事業聯合行為規定之敘述，何者錯誤？",1786689136247]